The official Dwayne Rudd's Helmet Draft Board
We are down to two weeks until the draft. We are still waiting to see which way Oakland will go, but I think I've seen/read enough to have a picture of how I think Phil Savage's draft board should read:
1) Trade Down: I feel that trading down should be a given, in almost any circumstance, since no matter how good a player appears it will almost never make up for the fact that multiple picks gives you a better chance of getting one right.
2) Joe Thomas: I personally do not know ANYTHING about the players in the draft, all I know is what the talking heads tell me, since I by and large ignore college football. But they are saying that Joe Thomas is a "sure thing" left tackle. Given our historical problems on the o-line, as well as the decent track record of tackles taken high in the draft, and this one seems like a no-brainer to me.
Taking Joe Thomas out of the mix, our remaining options (per Phil Savage) are:
>> Jemarcus Russell
>> Adrian Peterson
>> Calvin Johnson
>> Brady Quinn
3) Calvin Johnson: Let me 'splain. I do not want to add another wide receiver to this team, with all our other pressing needs. BUT, our other options are not exactly "pressing needs" either, in my opinion. I would rather we take the best player available. But:
3a) After drafting Calvin Johnson, we should continue trying to trade him for a first round pick plus later picks in the draft. We might not be able to get many trade offers while on the clock if other teams don't believe that we will take Johnson. But if we do take Johnson, and then Tampa is confronted with the choice of a drafting a QB or RB, or giving us their 1st and 3rd (or even 4th) round picks for Johnson, I think they may pull the trigger and make the trade. And if Tampa doesn't make the trade, there is a good chance another team will.
4) Jemarcus Russell or Brady Quinn. I am pretty ambivalent amongst these guys. Both guys have alot of superlatives in their biographies. A QB is not my top choice, but if either of these guys could be another Phillip Rivers or Carson Palmer, it may be worth the risk (at least compared to our other options).
5) Adrian Peterson. I have made my case against him in previous posts. Suffice it to say, he is too injury prone, and decent-to-good running backs are just too easy to find beyond first round picks.
I guess my best case scenario would be us trading down to get two picks later in the first round, at which point we would have more wiggle room to draft need guys, at defensive line, offensive line, or cornerback. But what are the chances?
Monday, April 16, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
You have some unrequited man-love for drafting O-linemen. I remember your schmooze fest with R. Gallery a few years back. How's he doing in Oakland? Second, have you read your King properly? This week he talks about how weak the draft is and no one will be trading up. I think that, barring some last-minute drama, we'll be getting BQ or AP.
Ah, but you misread King. He said that, past the top 5-6 players, the draft is very weak, and that nobody will be trading from low 1st round to mid round. But that just IMPROVES our draft position, since someone sitting at ten will know that they're stuck w/ bad picks if they can't get one of the top guys. Of course, that means that if we trade down we better be pretty happy with some of the guys who will be available, or we will be stuck with the bad picks.
And for every Robert Gallery you can name me, I can name you two Cade McNowns or Akili Smiths. Besides, at least Gallery is still playing, even if not a probowler.
Post a Comment